Disapperance

Although the death of a person is not considered with certainty, the legal termination of his personality by the court with the passing of certain periods of time of those who have been looked at with a possible eye and whose body has not been found is called imperfection.

According to the Turkish Civil Code, the conditions for a non-compliance decision arise in two ways:

a-his death is lost in possible danger; at the request of persons related to the passing of 1 year from the date of the disappearance of this person, the court in question makes a decision on negligence.

b-failure to receive news for a long time; in this case, 5 years from the date of receipt of the latest news from the person, at the request of the person concerned, a decision is made by the court in question.

32 Of The Turkish Civil Code.according to the article; “if there is a strong possibility of the death of a person who has been lost in danger of death or has not been heard from for a long time, the court may decide on the negligence of that person upon the application of those whose rights are related to that death. A competent court is the last settlement of a person in Turkey; if he has never settled in Turkey, the place where he is registered in the population register; if there is no such register, the place where his mother or father is registered is the court.” is called.

Accordingly, the court responsible for the decision of negligence is the “magistrate’s Court”. The competent court is the last place of settlement of the person in Turkey; if he has never settled in Turkey, the place where he is registered in the population register; if there is no such record, the place where his mother or father is registered is the court.

After the realization of the conditions necessary for a decision on negligence, the court will make a decision on the application of the interested parties (persons whose rights depend on the decision on negligence, heirs, creditors of wills, if these persons do not exist) to the competent and competent court.
The purpose of the announced decision is for the person to be made or those who know about it to reach the court for the purpose of rest. After the announcement decision is made, the court will evaluate a waiting period of not less than 6 months for the person or those who have information about it to give information. If the person who will be given a mistrial has not appeared, he has not been informed, and the date of his death has not been determined, the court will make a mistrial. Otherwise, the request for imperfection will be dropped.

The assets subject to inheritance are handed over to the heirs for a certain period of time and in exchange for collateral. The guarantee given by the heirs is limited to a certain period of time:

-5 years from the delivery of inherited goods in case of loss in danger of death,

-In case of failure to hear from him, the heirs of the person who will be made a decision on negligence, limited to 15 years from the date of receipt of the last News, must show assurance.

If a loss occurs during these periods, the heirs will return to the loss the share that was distributed to them. If a failure does not occur during these periods, or in the meantime, if a failure reaches the age of 100, the guarantees given in this regard will end; the heirs are considered to have decisively acquired the inheritance shared with him from Terek.

At the same time, the decision to leave does not end the marriage on its own. The spouse of the person who has been given a wrongful decision will be able to apply to the court and ask for the annulment of the marriage for this reason. Gaibin’s wife appears to be married in terms of marital status, and this marriage must be terminated by court order. The court in charge of this issue is the courts of First Instance.




Concrete Evidence Act

Article 1 – Article 10 of the law on administrative procedure No. 2577 6/1/1982 dated the first and the third sentence of the second paragraph of “Sixty” phrases “Thirty”, in the form of the second sentence contained in “sixty” the phrase “thirty”, in the form of the Fifth sentence in place “under” the phrase “four” in the form of sentences contained in the sixth and “sixty-day” phrase “thirty days” in the form of A has been replaced.

Article 2-the phrase “sixty” contained in the second paragraph of Article 11 of the Law No. 2577 has been changed to “thirty”.

Article 3-the phrase “sixty” contained in the first paragraph of Article 13 of the Law No. 2577 has been changed to “thirty”.

Article 4-the following sentence has been added to the first paragraph of Article 24 of the Law No. 2577.

“Decisions are written and signed within thirty days from the date of their issuance.”

Article 5-the following provisional article has been added to the Law No. 2577.

“PROVISIONAL ARTICLE 10-1. In respect of applications made to the administration in accordance with Articles 10, 11 and 13 prior to the date of entry into force of this article, the periods prior to the amendments made to this law shall apply to the specified articles.”

Article 6-the phrase “spouse” contained in Paragraph (d) of the first paragraph of Article 82 of the Turkish Penal Code dated 26/9/2004 and numbered 5237 has been changed to “spouse, divorced spouse”.

Article 7-the phrase “spouse” contained in Paragraph (A) of the third paragraph of Article 86 of the law No. 5237 has been changed to “spouse, divorced spouse”.

Article 8-the phrase “spouse” or divorced spouse “was added to Paragraph (B) of the second paragraph of Article 96 of the Law No. 5237 to come after the phrase” spouse”.

Article 9-the phrase “wife” was added to paragraph (E) of the third paragraph (E) of Article 109 of the Law No. 5237 to come after the phrase “wife” or divorced wife”.

Article 10-the following paragraph has been added to Article 12 of the Criminal Procedure Code dated 4/12/2004 and numbered 5271.

“(6) in cases of crimes committed by using information systems, banks or credit institutions, or bank or credit cards as tools, the courts of the victim’s settlement are also authorized.”

Article 11-the following sentence has been added to the first paragraph of Article 44 of the Law No. 5271.

“The decision to bring by force is also notified to the witness by using these tools if contact information such as telephone, Telegram, fax, e-mail is found in the file.”

Article 12-the following paragraph has been added to Article 94 of the Law No. 5271.

“(3) the release of a person arrested outside working hours on an arrest warrant issued for the purpose of obtaining testimony and who undertakes to be present before the judicial authority on the appointed date may be ordered by the public prosecutor. This provision can only be applied once for each arrest warrant. A person who does not fulfill his commitment is given an administrative fine of one thousand Turkish lira by the public prosecutor at the place where the arrest warrant is issued.”

Article 13-the phrase “based on concrete evidence” was added to the third paragraph of Article 100 of the Law No. 5271 to come after the phrase “concerning”.

Article 14-the following bent has been added to the second paragraph of Article 101 of the Law No. 5271.

“d) that the practice of judicial control will be insufficient,”

Article 15-the phrase “(e) in paragraph” contained in the sixth paragraph of Article 109 of the law No. 5271 was changed to “(e) and (j) in paragraphs” and the following sentence was added to the paragraph.

“However, both days that pass under the obligation not to leave the residence specified in paragraph (j) are considered as a day at the deduction of the penalty.”

Article 16-the phrase “the provisions of this article,” contained in the third paragraph of Article 110 of the law No. 5271, was amended as “the provisions of the first and second paragraphs of this article,” and the following paragraph was added to the article.

“(4) as to whether the suspect or defendant’s obligation to continue the judicial control should be required at the latest December four months; at the request of the prosecutor of the Republic at the stage of the investigation, the magistrate is decided by the court of resen at the stage of the prosecution, taking into account the provisions of Article 109.”

Article 17-the following article has been added to the Law No. 5271 to come after Article 110.

“Time under judicial control

Article 110 / A – (1) the period of judicial control in cases that do not fall under the duty of a Heavy Criminal Court is no more than two years. But this period can be extended for another year, citing mandatory cases.

(2) in cases that fall under the duty of a Heavy Criminal Court, the period of judicial control is no more than three years. This period may be extended in mandatory cases by showing the justification; the extension period may not exceed a total of three years, the crimes defined in the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh sections of the Second Book of the Turkish Penal Code, as well as four years in crimes covered by the Anti-Terrorism Law.

(3) the judicial control periods provided for in this article shall be applied at half the rate for the care of children.”

Article 18-the following sentence was added to the third paragraph of Article 137 of the law No. 5271, the phrase “or prosecution” was added to the fourth paragraph of the article to come after the phrase “investigation” and the phrase “Attorney General’s office,” contained in the paragraph, was changed to “Attorney General’s office or court.”

“In the case of an acquittal, records related to detection or listening are destroyed by the same procedure under the supervision of a judge.”

Article 19-the fourth paragraph of Article 170 of the Law No. 5271 “is explained.“the phrase ” is explained; the events that constitute the uploaded crime and information that has nothing to do with the evidence of the crime are not included. changed to”.

Article 20-the following sentence has been added to the first paragraph of Article 176 of the law No. 5271.

“In addition, information about the indictment and the date of the trial; phone, Telegram, fax, e-mail, such as contact information in the file is also reported by using these tools, but the results linked to the call sheet are not applied in this case.”

Article 21-in the first paragraph of Article 233 of the Law No. 5271, the following sentences and the second paragraph “call to be made” were added to come after the phrase “and forced bringing”.

“An indictment is added to the call sheet when the prosecution phase is passed. In addition, information about the indictment and the date of the hearing are also notified by using these tools if contact information such as telephone, Telegram, fax, e-mail is contained in the file.”

Article 22 – The fourth paragraph of Article 250 of Law No. 5271 “base sentence” is to come after the phrase “and if the conditions are discovered, the provisions on the crime have been applied chaining determined from the sentence after the phrase” and added the following sentence to the eleventh paragraph of the matter is the eighth and the ninth paragraph, “the terms of reasoning and the action of the series takes place if the procedure is within the scope of a claim in accordance with the determined sanction, believes that” the phrase “the circumstances occurred, if he believes that the action is within the scope of serial reasoning and that a decision on conviction should be made according to the available evidence in the file, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph four to seven, not more severe than the sanction specified in the request article,” and the Fourteenth paragraph has been amended as follows.

“The request letter, which is understood to have been issued in violation of this paragraph, material error was made in the sanction determined, objective conditions were not met in the application of articles 231 or 50 and 51 of the Turkish Penal Code or a security measure appropriate to the nature of the proposed penalty, is returned to the prosecutor general’s office by the court in order to complete the deficiencies. After the deficiencies are completed and the wrong points are corrected by the public prosecutor, the request letter is reorganized and sent to the court.”

“Serial reasoning does not apply if a crime that is covered by this is committed together with another crime that is not covered.”

“(14) the provision established by the court in accordance with the ninth paragraph may be appealed. The objection authority shall examine the objection in terms of the terms in the third and ninth paragraphs.”

Article 23-the following sentence has been added to the first paragraph of Article 251 of the Law No. 5271.

“In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 175, a simple trial procedure is not applied after the date of the hearing is determined.”

Article 24-paragraph (b) of the third paragraph of Article 268 of the Law No. 5271 has been amended as follows.

“b) the examination of appeals against the decisions made by the magistrate regarding arrest and judicial control belongs to the judge of the Criminal Court of First Instance, where he is located around the judiciary. In cases where the authorities authorized to examine the objection are different, necessary measures are taken by the magistrate whose decision is appealed in order to examine the objections without delay. If the affairs of the magistrate are seen by the criminal judge of first instance, the authority to examine the objection belongs to the president of the Criminal Court.”

Article 25 – Article 9 of the Law No. 5275 on the execution of sentences 13/12/2004 dated in the fifth paragraph of the temporary article “seven times” the phrase “nine times”, in the form of the sixth paragraph, “31/7/2021” the phrase “was amended to 30/11/2021.

Article 26-the following article has been added to the law on the establishment and judicial procedures of the Constitutional Court dated 30/3/2011 and numbered 6216.

“Internship in court

Article 73 / A – (1) candidates for judges and interns of lawyers can do internships in court. The procedures and principles for the application of this article are regulated by the regulation.”

Article 27 – this law;

a) Articles 16, 17 and 24 on 1/1/2022,

b) Articles 11, 20 and 21 on 1/9/2021,

c) other articles at the date of publication,

it goes into effect.

Article 28-the provisions of this law are executed by the President.

13/7/2021

Petition For a Loss Of Vehicle Value From an Insurance Company

X INSURANCE GENERAL DIRECTORATE

CLAIMANT :

ADDRESS :

ATTORNEY :

ADDRESS :

MOBILE PHONE NO. :

PLATE NO :

CAUSE OF ACCIDENT

ISSUER INSURED :

DRIVE :

POLICY NO. :

PLATE NO. :

Dear Interlocutor,

2017 Tofas-Fiat Linea Urban 1.3 Multi-Jet 95 HP vehicle with X engine number and X chassis number. X Cad. as a result of the collision of the car with the license plate X with the owner x and the driver x insured by the company with the policy number x, the car with the license plate X with the owner x and the driver x with the license plate X with the customer’s vehicle with the above information written was damaged. Accident detection minutes related to this are in October-1.

After the accident, the repair and repair of the car belonging to the client was carried out, and the expert report was issued on the date of X by the expert named X of Company X in relation to this repair and repair (October-2). Again, pictures of the moment and after the accident are available in this expert report.

The car belonging to the client was devalued due to this accident and could not be used during his stay in service. For this reason, the client has an obligation to apply to remedy the damage suffered by the company.

In accordance with the established case law of the Supreme Court, you must pay as the insurer of the vehicle with license plate number x, which is completely defective in the accident, for the loss of value caused by the accident on the vehicle belonging to the client. In accordance with the general conditions of compulsory financial liability insurance, the insurer shall be entitled to 3.he is jointly and severally liable for material and physical damages caused to persons, provided that they remain within the limits of the guarantee. Accordingly, since the loss of value incurred as a result of an accident in the car belonging to the client also constitutes an item of economic material damage, this damage must be directly compensated by the insurance company. Again the same act 1429. According to the article, the insurer is obliged to compensate for damages caused by the negligence of the insured, the insured, the beneficiary and the persons to whom they are legally responsible for their actions, if there is no contract to the contrary.

As a result of the accident, the vehicle belonging to the surrogate client has lost the value of the vehicle in US $ 10,000, and we request that the relevant amount be deposited in the account number x bank X branch TRx IBAN on behalf of the client, based on my powers contained in the power of attorney.

Result and demand

For the reasons described above;

100% of your insured due to the defect of the surrogate client’s vehicle caused by the loss of value of the vehicle 10.000 TL financial compensation for excess rights with the registration to be reserved X Bank X branch TRx IBAN account
We supply and demand Bilvekale. …/…/…

The Requesting Attorney

Hunt.

BANK ACCOUNT INFORMATION

ACCOUNT HOLDER :

BANK NAME :

ACCOUNT NO. :

IBAN NO :

Eks:

1 -) Accident Detection Minutes.

2 -) expert report dated x.

3 -) copies of the license.

4 -) power of Attorney.

BREAKING FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW

T.C. SUPREME
10.Criminal Division

CRIME OF DRUG TRAFFICKING – REQUEST FOR VIOLATION OF THE LAW – POSTPONING THE EXECUTION AT THE REQUEST OF THE CONVICT – THE NEED TO DECIDE TO REJECT THE APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTION JUDGE – THE PROVISION IS BROKEN

SUMMARY: the law 5275 on the execution of sentences of postponing the execution of the prisoners numbered prompt> titled item in decision making in relation to request the postponement of the execution of carrying out the execution of the public prosecutor’s office appreciation rights, recognition of Public Prosecutor’s office against the decision on the request for a stay of execution by disregarding the path is not foreseen any law, convicts defender of H when you hit a denial of appeal against the decision of the decision should be made hakimligi, the decision to delay the execution of the convicted person’s prison sentence with the acceptance of the appeal is against the law, and the desire to break it in the interests of the law was therefore considered appropriate.

(5237 P. K. m. 52, 62, 188, 191) (5275 S. K. m. 17, 98) (5271 P. K. m. 309) (12. CD. 14.11.2011 T. 2011/11301 E. 2011/4822 K.)

Case: High Justice Department convicted of drug traffickingH. at the execution stage of the sentence, Hatay 2. At the request of the decision of 07.11.2013 October 2013/1054 regarding the acceptance of the appeal given by the Heavy Criminal Court for the benefit of the law, the file was sent to our office in the annex of the notification letter dated 07.02.2014 of the prosecutor general’s Office of the Supreme Court.

File’s been reviewed.

As Necessary, Discussed And Considered:

Verdict: from the file under review;

a) convicted Y.H. on 03.05.2007, the Hatay Heavy Criminal Court decided 2007/104 and 2007/422 with the number 188/3, 191/3, 62 and 52 of the TCK. in accordance with the Articles 2 years 1 month imprisonment and 1000 TL judicial fine is punishable, the provision has been finalized,

b) the prisoner at the stage of execution, Law No. 5275 17. in accordance with the article, the request to postpone the execution of the prison sentence for 6 months was rejected by the Hatay Prosecutor General’s Office on 26.09.2013 by Decision No. 2013/1458,

c) after the convicted defense appealed the decision to reject the request to postpone the execution, the judge of the Hatay execution on 11.10.2013 2013/2151 basis and 2013/2136 decision number and the prosecutor of the Republic decided that there is no place to decide on the request for the convicted defense, since the legal path against the decision to refuse the request to postpone the execution is not provided for,

d) after the defense of the convict appealed the decision of the Hatay execution Judge, Hatay 2. By the Heavy Criminal Court on 07.11.2013 2013/1054 with the acceptance of the appeal with different business numbers to the cancellation of the decision of the Hatay execution Judge dated 11.10.2013, in accordance with the request of the convicted Prosecutor General’s Office of Hatay dated 26.09.2013 by the cancellation of the decision of Refusal, law No. 5275 17/1. in accordance with the article, it was decided that the prison sentence of the convicted person, which is 2 years and 1 month, should be postponed from 28.09.2013 until 28.03.2014

It was understood.

In a request and notice for violation of the law, 98/1 shaped. Article 17 of the same law. article 98 of Law No. 5275 does not cover objections to rejection decisions issued by prosecutors on requests for postponement of execution, the request to postpone the execution is not a situation that causes pause in the account of the sentence to be imposed. it was not necessary to request a decision from the court specified in the article, and the decision to reject the appeal in writing, rather than accepting the appeal, without regard to the refusal of the request for the postponement of the execution, will not be able to object to the rejection decisions made by the prosecutors.> by saying, Hatay 2. It was requested that the decision of the High Criminal Court dated 07.11.2013 be violated in the interest of the law.

Although it was stated that the authority had not been hit in deciding to reject the appeal, it was understood that the appeal had been accepted in the concrete case.

Conclusion: Law No. 5275 on the execution of criminal and security measures entitled 17. in the article, request the postponement of the execution of carrying out the execution of the public prosecutor’s office in relation to decision-making rights of appreciation, recognition, public prosecutor’s office against the decision on the request for a stay of execution by disregarding the path of any law is not foreseen, dated 11.10.2013 hakimligi defender of the execution of the convicts of Hatay’s appeal against the decision of the decision should be made when a denial of objections with the adoption of the execution of his sentence, the prisoner is unlawful and request the postponement of the decision in favor of the law in place therefore the reversal seen; Hatay 2. 309 of CMK No. 5271 of the decision of the Heavy Criminal Court dated 07.11.2013 and amended 2013/1054. Article 3. violation of the law in accordance with paragraph 309 of the same law. Article 4. in order for the necessary actions to be taken in accordance with Paragraph (A) of the paragraph, it was unanimously decided on 14.04.2014 that the file should be sent to the prosecutor general’s office of the Supreme Court for transmission to the said Court.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur

ACHIVEMENTS

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur
magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem
ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora
incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis
nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur

ACHIVEMENTS

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur
magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem
ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora
incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis
nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam.

Advocate for the defendant at trial

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur

ACHIVEMENTS

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur
magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem
ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora
incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis
nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam.