ISTANBUL COMMERCIAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

File: 2017 / XXXX.

The case in which we reported the file number above and which is being heard in your court is XX.XX.XXXX Date Time 10.30 atili hearing on the same day, Istanbul Anatolian Commercial Court of First Instance 2016/XXX e no.10.00 atili and Istanbul Anatolian Civil Court of First Instance 2015/XXX e no. 11.00 atili hearing will be held.

With the acceptance of our professional excuse, we submit to your tensip and opinions that the hearing should be postponed to another day, which will be considered appropriate, and that the hearing day should be learned through the UYAP system.

ACTING PLAINTIFF
Hunt. …………………

Istanbul. Executive Directorate

File No: 2017 / XXXX Esas

AMBARLI CUSTOMS DIRECTORATE ISTANBUL

LENDER :

Attorney: lawyer Arif BALTACI

DEBT :

Amount of debt: 751,107. 52-TL (excluding interest, power of attorney and expenses)

Business due to this debt, the execution follow-up made to the file debtor XX as a result of the follow-up made from the above file of our directorate.XX.It has been notified and finalized on XXXX and it has been decided to put a lien comment on the record of all rights and receivables of the debtor in the records of your Directorate.

Please send the result of the execution of the decision requirement to the file of our directorate.

Any evidence obtained in violation of the law in accordance with article 206 of the code of Criminal Procedure is invalid. 22 Of The Constitution. According to the article, the confidentiality of communication is essential. 20 of the Constitution. His article states that private life cannot be touched. But if the person is certain that the evidence will be lost in the attack against him, and it will not be possible to prove it again, the evidence that he will receive will be binding. Even if the person in question obtained evidence of the threat to him during his argument with the attacker by unlawful means, the evidential value of obtaining an audio recording of the sudden incident will arise, as there is no opportunity to contact the competent authorities at that time and the evidence will be lost. You can look at the example Supreme Court decision.

Criminal Division

Base Number: 2021/6097

Decision Number: 2021/10635

“text of jurisprudence”

DECISION

October 05.11.2018 and 2018/2533 investigation,2018/1 Karşıyaka, regarding the extension of the investigation, since the DVD recording in the annex to the appeal petition must be resolved by expert ingenuity, with the acceptance of the appeal, for the decision that there is no room for prosecution, given by the Prosecutor General’s Office of Foca No. 1.Karsiyaka. After the decision of the magistrate of 29/11/2018 and 2018/2752 different work, Foca Prosecutor General’s Office’ NCA completed the deficiency mentioned and sent the file to the authority for re-decision, at the end of the review, Karsiyaka 1 on the rejection of the appeal. Magistrate Criminal Judge 30/07/2019 dated and 2018/2752 different business decision by the Ministry of Justice on the benefit of the law requested to be broken, the Supreme Court Prosecutor General’s office 22.01.2021 days and 2021/4384 request letter sent to our apartment was examined.
At Istem;
“160 of law 5271. according to Article 170/2 of the same law, the public prosecutor must immediately begin investigating the truth of the work to decide whether there is room to open a public case as soon as he learns of a situation that gives the impression that a crime has been committed by a tip or other means. as a result of its evaluation in accordance with Article 172 of the said law, when it reaches the conclusion that the collected evidence creates sufficient doubt that the crime has been committed, it will file a public lawsuit by issuing an indictment, otherwise. according to Article 173/3 of the said law, he will decide that there is no room for prosecution, while the public prosecutor has not fulfilled the investigative task imposed on him by law 5271, and there is no investigation in accordance with the law. because the conditions in the article are not formed, the authority examining the objection may decide to accept the objection in order to enable the public prosecutor to investigate.;
According to the file scope; at the end of the investigation, there was animosity between the parties, witnesses at the scene did not confirm the claims of the suspects. decoy and decoy met to discuss the situation at the time of the incident. during the conversation, the suspect allegedly threatened the decoy with the form of “I will lay down his body”., abstract the claim, except that subsequent to the decision whether to prosecute for lack of evidence, the question for the decision of the appeal by complainant, upon the DVD attached to the petition of Appeal related to the event record should be made of the expert assessment specified with the investigation on the extension of BET Karşıyaka 1. After the decision of the magistrate Criminal Court dated 29/11/2018 and numbered 2018/2752, the expert report dated 01/07/2019 on the resolution of the DVD recording was taken and the file on the appeal was re-sent for decision by the court “ ” … abstract claims of the client and the sound recording, which is illegal evidence received within the planning, there are not enough reasons for the opening of the public case…”;
According to the expert report dated 01/07/2019 file located between the suspect during the conversation, “you ain’t here I” shaped the sentence Where are hesitant about the use against the suspect, the animosity between the complainant, the suspect and the evidence against him because of an unfair attack in order to prevent the possibility of loss to prevent the loss of audio and video recording, it is understood that the suspect is aware of existing footage from the records, as record specifies not made to the plaintiff to appeal to any word and in action, in this case, the said record cannot be considered as evidence obtained illegally, recorded secretly/without knowledge in order to produce evidence in a systematic and planned way, the said record should be considered as evidence, without considering that there is sufficient evidence and suspicion to open a public case for a crime committed on the client, there was no hit in the decision to reject the appeal in written form instead of accepting it.” is called.
Legal Evaluation:
20 Of The Constitution Of The Republic Of Turkey. and 22. in its articles, the principles of privacy of persons ‘ private lives and communication are guaranteed, 38/6. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights from international texts. preserved the secrecy of private life in Article 6. the article also regulates the right to a fair trial. Again, in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, it has been accepted that unlawful evidence obtained in violation of the principle of confidentiality of private life will constitute a violation of the provisions of the Convention, (see warnings and precautions). 6. Shenk-Swiss decision of 12.7.1988 in terms of Article, prg. 30-48; Dr. … , Right To A Fair Trial, 3.B. 2008, p. 291; 8.in terms of Article 26.4.1985 Malone-United Kingdom and 24.4.1990 France-Kruslin/ Huoin decision et al., Prof. Dr. … , Turkey’s Human Rights Issue 2004, p. 384 as for the regulation in our domestic law, 206/2-A and 217/2 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271. in its articles, it is explained that the law and unlawful evidence cannot be based on the provision.
On the other hand, 254/2 amended by Law No. 3842 of 18.11.1992 of Cmuk No. 1412, which was previously in force and regulated criminal proceedings. in its article, it is stated that” evidence obtained illegally by the investigative and prosecution bodies cannot be based on the verdict”. In the decision of the Constitutional Court of 22.6.2001 on the evidence obtained by private persons during the period of the said law, the following definitions were made: ” Cmuk 254/2. evidence prohibited in the article is evidence obtained illegally. Intent to violate the law is a violation of the accepted universal principles of law, along with all positive rules of law. It has a broader context than illegality in this sense. If there is a severe interference with constitutional rights, evidence obtained illegally by private persons must also fall within the scope of evidence bans. Because the main purpose of evidence bans is to protect basic human rights and freedoms. Defending a contrary opinion gives private individuals the opportunity to violate the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals, which is unacceptable in a state of law. Due to the CMUK 254/2 provision, it is not possible for the courts to consider the evidence obtained by violating human rights.
The most basic rights of people whose private conversations are recorded have been violated. Because 20 Of The Constitution. in the article the privacy of private life can not be violated, 22. the article contains the rule that confidentiality of communication is essential. Once this path is opened, the law is one of the Basic Rules of the state and its existence is 2. the article of the law on the prohibitions of evidence from the principle of the ‘state of law ‘ in its article will lose all its effect. The “principle of honest transaction”, which is one of the principles in our procedural law, also does not allow the use of evidence obtained in this way. 6th European Convention On Human Rights the right to a fair/fair trial, regulated in the article, provides for the trial of persons in accordance with the rules of the rule of law. A violation of this rule will violate the fair transaction and the principle of honest transaction.”

In the face of the legal regulations and judicial case law described, only audio and video recordings recorded in accordance with the law and method of persons have the nature of evidence. However, since secretly recording a person’s interview is illegal, it is not possible to evaluate it as evidence. However Dairemizce adopted and numbered and date and the date of ycgk 21.05.2013 2012/5 2013/248 13.12.2018 2017/5 mainly based on 2018/639 as stated in the decision, against oneself in relation to a crime that is being processed, and does not have the ability to obtain more evidence on how to contact the competent authorities in cases of no sudden to record his conversations with the adoption of the law of the state, the opposing party is mandatory. Otherwise, evidence is lost and cannot be obtained again.
At the end of the investigation, there was animosity between the parties, witnesses at the scene did not confirm the claims of the suspects. decoy and suspect met to discuss the situation at the time of the incident. decoy and suspect allegedly threatened to “lay down his body” during the conversation…………. decoy…………., abstract the claim, except for the following decision upon appeal, the decision whether to prosecute for lack of evidence by complainant appeal that is related to the specified event record attached to the petition of the investigation with DVD expert assessment should be made on the extension of BET Karşıyaka 1. According to the decision of the magistrate’s Criminal Court dated 29/11/2018 and numbered 2018/2752, the expert report dated 01/07/2019 on the resolution of the DVD recording in question was edited and Karsiyaka 1. Magistrates ‘ Court date 30.07.2019, different business 2018/2752 by the state “…the complainant claims and abstract nature of evidence taken within a planning a violation of law in a public trial in addition to sound recording are not sufficient grounds for the opening of…” were dismissed on the grounds that it was understood that the objection. It is clear that during the discussion between the suspect and the suspect, he received an audio recording in a sudden developing situation in which there is no opportunity to obtain any more evidence of the crime being committed against him and there is no decency to contact the competent authorities. It is not possible to make an audio recording within the framework of planning. It is against the law to decide on rejection rather than acceptance of the appeal for the reasons described.
Conclusion and decision:
For the reasons described above;
Since the Supreme Court is seen in the place of thought in the communique organized by the Prosecutor General’s office in accordance with the request to break the law in the interests of the public,
1-Karsiyaka 1. Magistrate’s decision of 30/07/2019 and 2018/2752 different business numbered, 5271 numbered CMK 309. deterioration according to the article,
2-CMK 309. in accordance with paragraph 4-a of the article, it was unanimously decided on 24.03.2021 to complete the subsequent transactions at the site and to submit the file to the Attorney General of the Supreme Court for submission to the Supreme Ministry of Justice.

An employer who employs an employee during a week’s vacation must give the employee a 1.5-day salary for a week’s vacation. You can look at the example Supreme Court decision.

Civil Department

Base Number: 2016/7708

Decision Number: 2019/18054

“text of jurisprudence”

COURT :EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL

As a result of the case between the parties, the decision was requested by the defendant’s attorney to examine the appeal, and it became clear that the appeal requests were pending Dec. After hearing the report issued by the examination Judge for the case file, the file was examined, the need was discussed and considered:
SUPREME COURT DECISION
A) Summary Of The Plaintiff’s Request:
Attorney of the plaintiff claimed that his client worked as a transport driver and purchasing staff from 17/10/2007 to 14/03/2014 in the defendant’s workplace, the employment contract was terminated by the defendant unfairly and without notice and maliciously, and asked the defendant to collect severance, notice compensation and wages, overtime pay, national holiday general holiday fee, week holiday fee and annual leave fee.
B) Summary Of Respondent’s Response:
The defendant’s counsel, plaintiff’s started on 21/11/2007, in the history of 21/001/2008 quit of his own accord, and again a second time in the history of 16/04/2009 left of his own accord into that absence will receive a fee as claimed in the petition, it uses the permissions of annual leave, the payment of the fees of his work for the holidays, weeks of use, the study of religious holidays, arguing that a dismissal has asked for.
C) Summary Of Local Court Decision:
Based on the collected evidence and expert report, the court decided to partially accept the case on the grounds that the plaintiff had the right to claim severance and notice compensation, since it was understood that the plaintiff worked for a total of 5 years and 28 days in two periods in the defendant’s workplace, because the contract of employment was unfairly and unannounced by the defendant’s employer.
D) Appeal:
The defendant’s attorney appealed the decision.
E) Justification:
1-according to the articles in the file, the evidence collected and the legal reasons on which the decision is based, the defendant’s appeals that fall outside the scope of the following paragraphs are not in place.
2-there is a dispute between the parties in terms of the account of the week decal fee.
46 of the Labor Law No. 4857. in accordance with the second paragraph of the article, the employee’s wages are paid in full without the provision of a job for the day of the week holiday that is not worked. Although it is not regulated in the law how to calculate the wage of an employee working during a week’s vacation, the opinion that the work performed during a week’s vacation in our apartment will be considered excessive work, accordingly, the wage should be paid with a fifty percent increase (Supreme Court 9.H.D. 23.5.1996 day 1995/37960 E, 1996/11745 K.). Accordingly, if it is worked during the week’s holiday, it should be paid as one and a half hours in addition to a day that should be paid without the equivalent of work.
Week holiday fees are calculated on the period fee worked. It would not be correct to calculate according to the final fee. In this case, it is not enough to know the last wage of the employee to account for the weekly holiday wages. The amount of employee wages should also be determined during the period subject to the request. If the employee’s wage for past periods cannot be determined, the ratio of the known wage to the minimum wage and the determination of the unknown wage accordingly are accepted by our department. But in cases such as when an employee receives various titles by being promoted during his work in the workplace, or recently benefits from a collective bargaining agreement, it is not right to consider the ratio of the last known wage to the minimum wage in terms of past periods. In such cases, fee research should be carried out from the relevant professional organizations for unknown periods and other evidence in the file should be evaluated together and concluded.
For jobs paid per piece or according to the amount of work performed, the amount of wages earned during the payment period should be calculated by dividing by the number of days worked. In terms of workplaces where the percentage procedure is applied, the sum of the wages obtained by the worker that week is divided into six and the holiday fee is obtained. The weekly holiday fee in the form of work in which the percentage procedure or piecemeal fee is provided must be calculated according to the increased part of the determined daily fee.
In a concrete dispute, the court must be paid within the monthly fee of 1 day, which must be paid without working in terms of Week holiday days, while the provision that you will receive by making an account of 1.5 days for an unpaid week holiday should be made under 2.5 days, the decision of the erroneous expert report that calculates is not accurate.
3-in the expert report based on the court’s decision, the national holiday general holiday fee deserved by the plaintiff was calculated as TL 855.15 net. In the grounds of the decision by the court, it was announced that a reasonable discount based on the presumption was made by 1/3 of this receivable, and accordingly, it is wrong to rule for $ 683.47, while a net of $ 570.10 should be imposed.
4-HMK of not specifying in the provision whether the amounts stipulated are net or gross.pp. 297/2. it was not thought to be contrary to the article and would lead to hesitation in execution.
F) Result:
A unanimous decision was made on 14.10.2019 to overturn the appeal decision due to the reasons written above, to return the appeal fee received in advance to the relevant person on request.

Supreme Court 9. Law Department decision E 2015/711b 2016/9142 K 12.04.2016;

Case: plaintiff vs. defendant, wage, overtime pay, public holiday, weekend pay, annual leave
the defendant-against-the-claimant requested that the payment of the notice compensation be decided.
The Local Court decided to partially accept the original case and to accept the opposite case.
During the sentence, the plaintiff-the opposing defendant’s lawyer appealed, for the case file
After hearing the report issued by the examination judge, the file was examined, and the need was discussed.
references:
A) Plaintiff-Defendant Summary Of The Request:
Plaintiff-defendant to work as Mixer operator and shipping officer on 10/04/2011
started, worked until 10/04/2013, last net wage is 2,300. 00 TL,plaintiff
he works 45 hours a week, but overtime wages are not paid, on public holidays
claim that his work has not been paid, that his annual leave has not been used, that his salary has not been paid
by driving, you will receive overtime pay, Week holiday fee, annual leave fee and public holiday fee
has been.
B) Summary Of The Respondent-Versus-Plaintiff Response:
Defendant-counter plaintiff, the plaintiff worked between 10/04/2011-27/03/2013, decommissioned
he worked as a concrete plant shipment manager until the date of his departure, the plaintiff was paid a minimum wage
work, all plaintiff’s wages are paid, when the defendant is forced to work overtime in rebellion
that it was made and paid for, that the plaintiff used his annual leave during the working period,
6 days a week in the defendant’s rebellion, the plaintiff did not have a week’s holiday fee, national holiday
that their claims about their work have no basis, that they have been bartered offsetting,
payment of notice compensation to the plaintiff since the plaintiff has terminated the employment contract without complying with the notice guidelines
he argued that the case should be dismissed and that the notice compensation should be accepted.
C) summary of Local Court decision and judicial process:based on the evidence collected by the court and the expert report, in terms of the actual case: overtime and weekend work performed on the burden of proof that the plaintiff does not fulfill this obligation
finding cases against the defendant of the plaintiff witnesses that he could not bring, which he could not bring, the witness from this point of view
it was not possible to be respected for his statements, the phenomenon of overwork and weekend work
it is understood that the plaintiff party that will be able to prove cannot present evidence in Basque, the requests for this item will be received
the denial is that the plaintiff works on public holidays, as is understood by the defendant’s witness statements,
public holiday fee since it cannot be proven that the fee against his work was paid by the defendant’s employer
it has been decided that he will receive.
From the point of view of the case: the plaintiff claimed that the contract of work was terminated by the defendant
however, the plaintiff’s handwritten resignation statement indicates otherwise that no evidence has been submitted to the file and
17 of the plaintiff’s law 4857, which did not show any reason in the declaration of resignation.
in accordance with the article, the defendant must notify the employer in advance of the termination, the defendant must notify the employer
it has been decided that he will receive notice compensation on the grounds that he has the right to claim compensation.
D) appeal:the decision has been appealed by the plaintiff-the defendant’s attorney.
E) Justification:
1-according to the articles in the file, the evidence collected and the legal reasons on which the decision is based, the plaintiff
the appeals of the defendant’s attorney, which are outside the scope of the following bend, are not in place.
2-non-payment of employee’s wages or … based on their premiums over the actual wage
Article 24/II-E of law 4857 gives the employee the right to justified termination. Another
although the reason for termination is in accordance with Article 435/2 of the Tbk, which is in force on the date of termination from the party
service in accordance with the rules of honesty from the party that terminates the contract, if it must be notified by the party
if it is not expected to maintain its relationship, all conditions will be considered justifiable reasons, so the employee
failure to clearly state the reason for termination does not affect the result. Plaintiff’s general holiday fees were not paid
and … it is fixed that their premiums are not reported on the actual fee, and essentially this Court is also
is the adoption. It is constant that the business relationship is therefore unbearable, and the plaintiff soon after termination
he’s suing. In this case, the defendant-against due to the termination of the plaintiff’s business contract for the right reason
the plaintiff’s claim for notice compensation is erroneous when it is required to be rejected.
3-reputation for the statements of the plaintiff witnesses in the court on the grounds that they have filed a lawsuit against the employer
the plaintiff could not prove the overtime fee.
his refusal has been decided. But if there is evidence other than witness statements, and in the case filed by these witnesses
if it is accepted that overtime was done in the riot, this evidence must be evaluated together. In
according to the file, some payrolls have overtime payments, as well as shift work
the defendant’s witness statements are contradictory, and the defendant’s recognition also states that the plaintiff worked outside of shift
has been. On the other hand, the plaintiff was working 18 hours of overtime a week in the …’S riot, which was heard as a recognition
Istanbul Anadolu 9.is court date 17/07/2014 and E.2013/443, K.By resolution 2014/375
it has been accepted and this decision has been approved and finalized. If this decision is final, the defendant’s witness statements the plaintiff
when the witness accounts are evaluated together with; it is constant that overtime was done in the riot. Court
it should be decided that the expert will receive overtime by evaluating this report. Written
the decision to reject the request for overtime pay on the grounds was wrong and required to overturn it.
F) Result:
The appeal of the appeal was overturned due to the reasons written above,
on request, the return of the fee to the interested party was decided unanimously on 12/04/2016.

4. Criminal Division 2020/1991 E. , 2020/10523 K.

“text of jurisprudence”

Accused of threatening…, 5237 of the Turkish Criminal Code 106/1, 43/2 and 62/1. in accordance with Articles 6 months and 7 days of imprisonment for the Army 2. Criminal Court of First Instance dated 12/12/2019 and 2018/909 basis, 2019/804 decision, Ministry of Justice General Directorate of Criminal Affairs expressed 25/03/2020 days and 94660652-105-52-3394-2020-Puk requests, Supreme Court prosecutor general’s office 06/05/2020 days and 2020/41982 containing the thought of breaking the notice sent to the apartment, the file was examined:

In the prompt article; ” according to the scope of the file;
As described in the Decree No. 265 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237 of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Criminal Justice dated 02/03/2010 and 2009/9-259 basis, Decision No. 2010/47. in order to prevent a public official from performing his duty, the crime occurred with the use of algebra and/or threats, in a concrete incident, the accused was drunk and caused discomfort to those around him, he insulted and threatened the guards during the identity check by the guards who came to him, the action of the accused constituted the crimes of resisting and insulting not performing the duty by threatening in general, 42 of law 5237. in its article, ” a crime that is considered a single verb is called a compound crime because one constitutes an element or aggravating cause of the other. In such crimes, the provisions on drinking do not apply.”according to the regulation in the form of effective resistance, the defendant cannot be sentenced for the crime of threat, which remains in the element of the crime of effective resistance, without regard to the establishment of the sentence in writing was not a hit.” is called.

Legal Evaluation:
265/1 of the Turkish Penal Code entitled “Resisting not to perform the duty”. article; ” a person who uses algebra or threats in order to prevent him from doing his duty against a public official is punished with a prison sentence of six months to three years.””
42 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237. in the article, compound crime is defined. according to the article; “a crime that is considered a single verb is called a even crime because one constitutes an element or aggravating cause of the other. In such crimes, the provisions on drinking do not apply.”
The scope of the file, the prompt for violation of the law, and all these explanations are considered together;
265/1 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237. in its article, ” a person who uses algebra or threats to prevent him from doing his duty to a public official shall be punished with a prison sentence of six months to three years.”when the regulation in the form of the evil eye is taken, because the act of threat is an element of the crime of resisting to not perform the duty, 42 of law 5237. according to the article, it is clear that no conviction can be established for the crime of threat.
For the reasons described; accused of threatening…, 5237 of the Turkish Criminal Code 106/1, 43/2 and 62/1. in accordance with Articles 6 months and 7 days imprisonment for conviction Army 2. The Criminal Court of First Instance dated 12/12/2019 and 2018/909 basis, 2019/804 no hits in the decision.

Conclusion and decision:
For the reasons described above;
1-since the reason for the violation contained in the notification issued by the Prosecutor General of the Supreme Court on the request to violate the law is seen on the spot, established for threatening crimes, Army 2. 12/12/2019 dated and 2018/909 basis of the Criminal Court of First Instance, 2019/804 no. of the final decision, 5271 no. 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code. deterioration according to the article,
2 – Prohibition of repeating proceedings and according to Paragraph 4-d of the same article of law;
265/1 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237. in its article, ” a person who uses algebra or threats to prevent him from doing his duty to a public official shall be punished with a prison sentence of six months to three years.”it was unanimously decided on 05/10/2020 that the sentence of 6 months and 7 days of imprisonment against the accused … should be abolished because the act of threat is an element of the crime of resisting not to perform the duty.

…… TO THE FAMILY COURT

Party: XXXXXXXX (t.C. ID No : ……………)

Party: YYYYYYYY (t.C. ID No : …………… )

Subject: the divorce protocol is presented to the court.

INSTRUCTIONS :

Parties …/…/… married since the date ……… and …….. they have two children together named. The parties agree to the termination of the marital union by this protocol, which is presented before the court. Other agreed upon issues regarding divorce are as follows::

CUSTODY AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP

Common children from the marriage of the parties………….. and ………..the mother will receive custody of XXXXXXXX.

The days when joint children will have a personal relationship with the defendant father YYYYYYYY should be written in this section.

ALIMONY AND COMPENSATION

SUBSIDIARY ALIMONY

Father yyyyyyyy every month to mother for each child for the expenses required for the development of children…….. Total for two children, TL ………. TL will pay subsidiary alimony.

POVERTY SUPPORT

At the end of the marital union established between the parties, the defendant YYYYYYYY, the plaintiff xxxxxxxx will pay poverty alimony in TL every month………………… Dec…………………

COMPENSATION

Defendant YYYYYYYYY due to events caused by him in the marriage union plaintiff xxxxxxxx ………. – TL financial compensation, …………… TL will pay moral compensation.

SHARING GOODS

It was obtained in the Union of marriage …. Ili, …. County, ….. Location, Island, Real Estate with parcel number will be registered in the title deed in the name of the plaintiff woman XXXXXXXX. All household items found in the joint residence of the parties shall be taken by XXXXXXXX.

Trial costs and surrogacy fees

The parties do not have any claims from each other in terms of trial costs and power of attorney fees.

Result and demand

The parties, by their free will, have reached agreement on the above-mentioned issues and agree to divorce based on these conditions. For all these reasons, the decision to divorce in accordance with the agreement with the acceptance of the negotiated divorce protocol by the Court of Honor is supply and demand.

PARTY PARTY

XXXXXXXX YYYYYYYY