Persons Who May Refrain from Testifying and Those Who May Refrain from Testifying
1-) The following persons may refrain from testifying:
a) Fiancée of the suspect or defendant,ho May Refrain from Testifying and Those Who May Refrain from Testifying
1-) The following persons may refrain from testifying:Who May Refrain from Testifying and Those Who May Refrain from Testifying
1-) The following persons may refrain from testifying:
a) Fiancée of the suspect or defendant,
b) The spouse of the suspect or defendant, even if the marriage bond is not present,
c) The upper or lower line of blood or in-law relatives of the suspect or defendant,
d) Blood relatives, including third degree, or in-laws, including second degree, of the suspect or accused,
e) Those who have an adoptive relationship with the suspect or Decedent.
2-) Those who are not in a position to understand the importance of refraining from testifying due to their age, mental illness or mental weakness may be heard as a witness with the consent of their legal representatives. If the legal representative is a suspect or accused, he/she cannot decide on the reservations of these persons.) Those who are not in a position to understand the importance of refraining from testifying due to their age, mental illness or mental weakness may be heard as a witness witThose who are not in a position to understand the importance of refraining from testifying due to their age, mental illness or mental weakness may be heard as a witness with the consent of their legal representatives. If the legal representative is a suspect or accused, he/she cannot decide on the reservations of these persons.
3-) Those who may hesitate to testify are informed that they may hesitate to testify before they rest. These people can always refrain from testifying while they are resting.”
The right to refuse to testify can be exercised both during the investigation and prosecution phases.
A witness who has the right to abstain from testifying has the right to request to be heard under oath.
The existence of betrothal can be understood by the facts that show that there is an intention to marry on the sides.A witness who has the right to abstain from testifying has the right to request to be heard under oath.
The existence of betrothal can be understood by the facts that show that there is an intention to marry on the sides.
If the judgment is based on the statements of a witness who has the right to abstain from testifying alone, failure to remind him of the right to abstain is taken into account if it is effective to the result as a procedural error.
Do not Be Afraid Because Of Your Profession And Pursuits
Even with the consent of the person concerned, the right of lawyers to abstain from testifying due to the nature of their professional activities is an absolute right. If there is the consent of the person concerned, members of the profession other than the legal profession do not have the right to refrain from testifying.Even with the consent of the person concerned, the right of lawyers to abstain from testifying due to the nature of their professional activities is an absolute right. If there is the consent of the person concerned, members of the profession other than the legal profession do not have the right to refrain from testifying.
The benefit that the disclosure of the material truth will provide from the point of view of society and the trust relations between the professionals and the people they will testify about have been discussed, and it has been found more beneficial from the point of view of the social fabric not to damage the trust.
Journalists are not considered to have professional secrets. For example, if a person is killed while the journalist is busy filming the news, the journalist has to testify, he has no right to hesitate. The journalist is obliged to tell the event he witnessed asournalists are not considered to have professional secrets. For example, if a person is killed while the journalist is busy filming the news, theJournalists are not considered to have professional secrets. For example, if a person is killed while the journalist is busy filming the news, the journalist has to testify, he has no right to hesitate. The journalist is obliged to tell the event he witnessed as a witness. However, the journalist is not obliged to disclose the news sources he learned about due to the news he has reported.
Notification of the Reason for Refraining from Testifying
Those who have the right to refuse to testify must report the facts that caused them to refuse to testify upon request by the relevant judicial authority.
The participating or accused subjects have not been granted the right to request the witness to inform the court of the facts that constitute a reason for hesitation.
The witness may be made to swear by the judge for the reason of refraining from testifying.The participating or accused subjects have not been granted the right to request the witness to inform the court of the facts that constitute a reason for hesitation.
The witness may be made to swear by the judge for the participating or accused subjects have not been granted the right to request the witness to inform the court of the facts that constitute a reason for hesitation.
The witness may be made to swear by the judge for the reason of refraining from testifying.
Do Not Be Afraid To Testify Against Him Or His Relatives
The witness, even if he testifies, CMK 45. he may hesitate to answer the questions specified in the article that may expose his relatives to criminal prosecution.
The purpose of the article is to prevent the witness from lying in order to protect himself or his relatives from criminal prosecution.
It should be reminded that the witness has the right to hesitate to answer questions that will lead to the opening of criminal proceedings against his relatives while being asked questions. should be reminded that the witness has the right to hesitate to answer questions that will
you can read our other articles and petition examples by clicking here