The fault imposed on one spouse in divorce cases also applies to the other spouse in another event. The terms “male” or “female” are used because Supreme Court decisions are made according to concrete events. It should not be assumed that there is a difference. In the present case, it was seen that the spouse who refused to meet with some of the man’s relatives and did not visit the feast was deemed to be defective. You can review the sample Supreme Court Decision.
Law office
Base Number: 2016/4522
Decision Number: 2017/9803
“Justice Text”
COURT :Family Court
TYPE OF CASE: Divorce
The judgment given by the local court at the end of the proceedings of the case between the parties, the date and number of which is shown above, is determined by the claimant man, in terms of the determination of fault, the compensations and alimony awarded to the woman; By the defendant woman, the document was read and the necessity was discussed and considered by appealing in its entirety:
In the petition; It is necessary to show clear summaries of all the facts, which are the basis of the claimant’s claim, under the serial number (HMK art. 119/1-e). The court cannot automatically examine the facts that were not duly relied upon by the plaintiff. The reason for the lawsuit and the facts must be clearly and concretely set forth in a clear and concrete way, suitable for the defense of the opposing party. given. Furthermore, the defendant’s faulty behavior necessitating divorce could not be proved. According to the actual situation, while the decision to reject the case should be decided, it was not found correct to accept the case in written form and required annulment.
CONCLUSION: It was unanimously decided that the appealed judgment be OVERROUND for the reason shown above, that there was no room for examining the appeals of the plaintiff man based on the reason for the reversal, that the appeal fee would be returned to those who deposited it upon request, within 15 days from the notification of this decision, with the possibility of rectification. 21.09.2017 (P