THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CRIME OF FABRICATING A CRIME AND THE CRIME OF DECRİMİNALİZATİON

The Crime of Fabricating a Crime is very similar to each other in practice, but differs in some ways from the crime of Slander, which is confused. The answer to the question of what is the Difference between the Crime of Fabricating a Crime and the Crime of Slander: The most important difference between the two types of crime is that the accusation in the crime of Decriminalization is committed against a certain person who is known to be innocent, while in the Crime of Fabricating Decriminalization there is no specific person to whom the act is attributed. In addition, the act that constitutes the subject of the crime of libel may have been committed by someone else, or it may not have been committed at all. However, in the Crime of Fabricating a Crime, the alleged act should never have taken place. Therefore, in the Crime of Fabricating a Crime, the act that constitutes a crime is in the foreground. In the crime of Slander, the perpetrator against whom the allegation of a crime is made is important.

The victim of the Crime of Fabricating a Crime is the State, since the type of crime in question is found only in the category of crimes against the Courthouse. In the crime of slander, the victim is the one who is unjustly accused of a crime.

In the crime of slander, unlike the crime of fabricating a crime, there is no condition that the action directed against a person who is known to be innocent is a crime in the sense of the Turkish Criminal Code; even the attribution of an act subject to administrative sanctions will lead to the formation of the Crime of Slander.

you can read our other articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Recommended Posts