THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IS ON THE LINK. THE CRIME OF DRUG TRAFFICKING IS DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURTTHHE SUPREME COURT DECISION IS ON THE LINK. THE CRIME OF DRUG TRAFFICKING IS DECIDED BTHE SUPREME COURT DECISITHE SUPREME COURT DECISION IS ON THE LINK. THE CRIME OF DRUG TRAFFICKING IS DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT
T.C. Supreme Court
10.Criminal Department
Originally: 2015/5406
The Verdict: 2017/4317
Decision Date: 3.10.2017
SUMMARY: Although the defendants’ crimes of drug trafficking are fixed, it shoHE SUPRHEHE SUPREME COURT DECISION IS ON THE LINK. THE CRIME OF DRUG TRAFFICKING IS DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT
T.C. Supreme Court
10.Criminal Department
Originally: 2015/5406
The Verdict: 2017/4317
Decision Date: 3.10.2017
SUMMARY: Although the defendants’ crimes of drug trafficking are fixed, it should be noted that the substances mentioned in phone calls and which some witnesses stated that they took from the defendants in their statements cannot be considered as drugs or stimulants due to the fact that they were not seized.
(5237 P. K. m. 43, 64, 188)
The file has been examined. Necessary discussions have been held:
A) Examination of the conviction verdict given against the accused … on the charge of drug trafficking in chainsA) Examination of the conviction verdict given against the accused … on the charge of drug trafficking in chains:
In the population registration sample taken from MERNIS through the UYAP system after the verdict and put in his file; In the face of the understanding that the defendant died on 10.06.2015, the court investon of the conviction verdict given against the accused … on the charge of drug trafficking in chains:
In the population registration sample taken from MERNIS through the UYAP system after the verdict and put in his file; In the face of the understanding that the defendant died on 10.06.2015, the court investigated whether the defendant died and determined that he died, the public case against him is 64/1 of the TCK No. 5237. There is a necessity to decide on its dismissal in accordance with article ,
Since the appeals of the defendant’s defense were therefore considered on the spot, it was necessary to OVERTURN the verdict without examining other aspectsSince the appeals of the defendant’s defense were therefore considered on the spot, it was necessary to OVERTURN the verdict without examining other aspects,
B) Examination of the provisions of the convictions of the defendants …, …, … and … on the charge of drug trafficking in chains:
Since it is understood that the proceedings during the trial were conducted in accordance with the law, the evidence was shown and discussed in the reasoned decision, his conscientious conviction was based on precise data in accordance with the documents and information in the file, it was determined that the actions were carried out by the defendants, the type of crime corresponding to the action and the sanctions other than the following were correctly determined, the rejection of other appeals that were not seen on the spot, but;
Although the defendants’ crimes of drug trafficking are fixed; regardless of the fact that the substances mentioned in phone calls and which some witnesses stated that they took from the defendants in their statements could not be considered drugs or stimulants due to the fact that they were not seized, 43 of the TCK applies to the defendants.lthough the defendants’ crimes of drug trafficking are fixed; regardless of the fact that the substances mentioned in Although the defendants’ crimes of drug trafficking are fixed; regardless of the fact that the substances mentioned in phone calls and which some witnesses stated that the
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clinking here.