T.C.
Supreme Court
9. law ofC.
Supreme Court
9. law T.C.
Supreme Court
9. law office
E. 2005/19254 – K. 2005/34532 – T. 25.10.2005
* FIXED-TERM SERVICE CONTRACT ( It is Necessary to Investigate Whether the Employee Who was Terminated Before His Term Worked at Another Workplace During the Balance Period, Whether He was C.
Supreme Court
9. law office
E. 2005/19254 – K. 2005/34532 – T. 25.10.2005
* FIXED-TERM SERVICE CONTRACT ( It is Necessary to Investigate Whether the Employee Who was Terminated Before His Term Worked at Another Workplace During the Balance Period, Whether He was Looking for a New Job and Whether He Had Income that He Deliberately Waived from Obtaining)
* BALANCE CONTRACT TERM FEE (It is Necessary to Investigate Whether He Works at Another Workplace During the Balance Period, Whether He is Looking for a New Job and Whether He Has Income that He Has Deliberately Waived from Obtaining)
* DISCOUNT CONDITIONS (The Balance to be Calculated by Taking into Account the Values Saved by the Employee Arising from the Inability to Work at the Workplace Subject to the Lawsuit Should be Discounted from the Contract Duration Fee)
818/m* DISCOUNT CONDITIONS (The Balance to be Calculated by Taking into Account the Values Saved by the Employee Arising from the Inability to Work at the Workplace Subject to the Lawsuit Should be Discounted from the Contract Duration Fee)
818/m.325
SUMMARY: The plaintiff requested that the decision be made to pay the compensation and wage receivables.UMMARY: The plaintiff requested that the decision be made to pay the compensation and wage receivables. An employee terminated before the term of a fixed-term service contract should be investigated whether he works at another workplace during the balance period, whether he is looking for a new job and whether he has income that he has deliberately waived, and the balance to be calculated should be deducted from the contract term fee, taking into account tARY: The plaintiff requested that the decision be made to pay the compensation and wage receivables. An employee terminated before the term of a fixed-term service contract should be investigated whether he works at another workplace during the balance period, whether he is looking for a new job and whether he has income that he has deliberately waived, and the balance to be calculated should be deducted from the contract term fee, taking into account the values that the employee has saved by not being able to work at the workplace subject to the lawsuit.
LAWSUIT : The plaintiff has requested that a decision be made to pay the compensation and wages he will receive.
The local court has partially ruled on the request. During the sentencing period, the file was examined by the plaintiff’s lawyer and the defendant, although the appeal was filed, the need was discussed and consideredThe local court has partially ruled on the request. During the sentencing period, the file was examined by the plaintiff’s lawyer and the defendant, although the appeal was filed, the need was discussed and considered:
DECISION : 1-According to the evidence collected in the articles in the file and the legally necessary reasons on which the decision is based, all of the defendant’s appeals and the plaintiff’s appeals that fall outside the scope of the following paragraph are out of place.
2-The plaintiff employee worked as a workplace physician and was terminated by the employer before the term of the fixed-term employment contract without a justified reason.-The plaintiff employee worked as a workplace physician and was terminated by the employer before the term of the fixed-term employment contract without a justified reason. The balance time fees were calculated by the expert witness according to the employment contracts p-The plaintiff employee worked as a workplace physician and was terminated by the employer before the term of the fixed-term employment contract without a justified reason. The balance time fees were calculated by the expert witness according to the employment contracts prepared between the parties to work at two different workplaces, and it was decided to partially accept the request by taking an estimated discount of 70% by the court. Dec. The court has not investigated whether the plaintiff worked at another workplace during the balance period and whether he had any other income-generating activities during this period, since the plaintiff is a doctor. Finally, it should be determined whether he is looking for a new job and whether he has income that he has deliberately waived to obtain, and finally, if the plaintiff has expenses that he avoids due to not working at the defendant’s workplace, these issues should be determined by determining 325 of the Code of Obligations.inally, it should be determined whether he is looking for a new job and whether he has income that he has deliberately waived to obtain, and finally, if the plaintiff has expenses that he avoids due to nFinally, it should be determined whether he is looking for a new job and whether he has income that he has deliberately waived to obtain, and finally, if the plaintiff has expenses that he avoids d
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clinking here.