Insulting in absentia, in other words, insulting in absence, occurs when the victim of the crime does not hear or see the insult. In insults in absentia, third parties who hear or see the insult, other than the victim, convey this insult to the victim. If the insult is committed in the absence of the victim, that is, in the absence of the victim, at least three people must hear the insult in order for the perpetrator to be punished. In order to be punished for insulting in absentia, the perpetrator must know about the conflict.
If the perpetrator has heard of the crime of insult committed by addressing a person, other people who are unaware of the perpetrator's existence, the element of conflict does not occur. As another example, an element of conflict does not occur if the perpetrator says insulting words to a person and that person also tells others. But if the perpetrator asks him to pass these words on to others, then crime occurs. In order for the crime of insulting to be committed in absentia, there must be a conflict with at least three people. It is not obligatory for the conflict to be made verbally. It can also be forwarded to at least three people by another means of communication.
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clicking here.
