
within the crime theory adopted by the new Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, there are a number of regulations under the name of personal reasons that reduce the penalty. Crime is embodied by the verb formed by the trio of movement, sequel and illusory Decoupling coming together.ithin the crime theory adopted by the new Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, there are a number of regulations under the name of personal reasons that reduce the penalty. Crime is embodied by the verb formed by the trio of movement, sequel and illusory Decoupling coming together. Movement is the main activity that constitutes a crime, and when this movement results in a result, the elements of the crime are formed spontaneously. However, it is essential in this regard that a link of illusion can be established between the movement and the Decoupling caused by the movement. As a matter of fact, if the necessary illusory connection has not been established, it will be obvious that the situation that constitutes the result is not caused by the movement in question. In this case, we can also say that the act did not cause the result, so the crime did not occur.As a matter of fact, if the necessary illusory connection has not been established, it will be obvious that the situation that constitutes the result is not caused by the movement in question. In this case, we can also say that the act did not cause the result, so the crime did not occur.
With the realization of the result, the crime is completed. Of course, these assumptions will be considered under the condition that the act in question is regulated exactly as a type of crime in the Turkish Criminal Code. This is also a requirement of the element of typicality.
Effective remorse is an arrangement that eliminates the punishment or is one of the personal reasons that require a reduction in the punishment. Dec. TCK 168. as it is regulated in the article, it is not an applicable provision for every type of crime.ffective remorse is an arrangement that eliminates the punishment or is one of the personal reasons that require a reduction in the punishment. Dec. TCK 168. as it is regulated in the article, it is not an applicable provision for every type of crime. However, effective repentance provisions can be applied to a limited number of crime types that are specifically stated in the law. These crimes are; crime of deprivation of liberty (TCK 110), crimes committed against property (TCK 168), manufacture of drugs or stimulants, purchase for trade or use, possession (TCK 192), organization for the purpose of committing a crime (TCK 221), embezzlement (TCK 248), bribery (TCK 254), slander (TCK 269), perjury (TCK 274).eprivation of liberty (TCK 110), crimes committed against property (TCK 168), manufacture of drugs or stimulants, purchase for trade or use, possession (TCK 192), organization for the purpose of committing a crime (TCK 221), embezzlement (TCK 248), bribery (TCK 254), slander (TCK 269), perjury (TCK 274).
Under What Conditions Does Effective Repentance Occur?
Based on the completion of the crime, there should be a provision for effective remorse in the crime within the scope of the TCK. Another personal reason that removes or reduces the penalty is voluntary renunciation. What makes effective remorse provisions different from voluntary renunciation provisions is that the crime has been completed.ased on the completion of the crime, there should be a provision for effective remorse in the crime within the scope of the TCK. Another personal reason that removes or reduces the penalty is voluntary renunciation. What makes effective remorse provisions different from voluntary renunciation provisions is that the crime has been completed. Effective remorse provisions will not find scope for application while the crime has not yet been completed.
Subsequently, the perpetrator or the person / persons participating in the crime must personally make restitution or compensation for the damage by showing remorse. This situation comes from the fact that there is a personal reason that removes or reduces the punishment.ubsequently, the perpetrator or the person / persons participating in the crime must personally make restitution or compensation for the damage by showing remorse. This situation comes from the fact that there is a personal reason that removes or reduces the punishment. As a result of one of the perpetrators showing effective remorse for jointly committed crimes and compensation for the damage caused, other sheriks who participate in the crime will not be able to benefit from this situation. Even though the perpetrators committed the crime jointly, the effective remorse mechanism works on a personal principle.
In case of partial compensation for the damage, the consent of the victim is sought first of all in order for effective regret provisions to be applied. In this case, since the victimization in question has not yet been resolved, the effective regret mechanism will not be able to work without consent.
Another important issue is related to when effective regret is involved. In this case, the effective remorse shown before the start of the prosecution and the effective remorse shown during the prosecution are of great importance in terms of criminal discount.nother important issue is related to when effective regret is involved. In this case, the effective remorse shown before the start of the prosecution and the effective remorse shown during the prosecution are of great importance in terms of criminal discount. If effective remorse is shown after the start of the prosecution and but before the sentencing, the penalty to be imposed is reduced by up to half. In case of effective remorse, the judge may make a reduction in the penalty at the rate determined in the article. In this regard, the judge has been granted discretion according to the sincerity of the effective regret and the amount of compensation for the damage. With this provision, the way has been opened for a certain reduction in the penalty in the event of a looting crime involving a special arrangement.
The law provides that for the crimes of theft, property damage, abuse of trust, fraud, fraudulent bankruptcy, installment bankruptcy, gratuitous exploitation and misuse of debit /credit cards, if the refund or compensation was made exactly before the start of the prosecution, the penalty should be reduced up to 2/3, and if it is made after the start of the prosecution and but before the sentencing, the penalty should be reduced up to 1/2.
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clinking here.
