The judge has not been given the authority to make a defect comparison in November related to life and caste divorce cases. Therefore, if the plaintiff gives evidence that he has committed an act meant for his life by his wife, the court will not make a judgment on whether the plaintiff is defective or, if he is defective, the extent of it. The most important justification for this is that no act and imperfect act that damages the marriage union can be compared to an attack on the human right to life.
As mentioned above, behaviors such as using violence, torturing, humiliating and swearing in front of others are considered to be degrading behaviors. If this is the case, there is no need to examine the defect situations of the parties by the judge.
In case of divorce due to caste, the judge may decide to reduce or remove the defective spouse’s residual share in the value in accordance with equity.
